Oh yes...

The battle of the ecdysteroids.

Turkesterone vs ecdysterone, which one is better?

Both of these are hyped up beyond any other natty anabolics. 

And they are easily the popular natty supplements that have exploded with interest. 

Ecdysterone is the better choice, easily.

We'll explain why... 

Ecdysterone is the better choice simply because it has more evidence that it works. 

Turkesterone is theorized to have more potent anabolic effects but the evidence is limited. 

Both of these ecdysteroids are similar and can help increase muscle protein synthesis. 

But they are made for advanced lifters because they are not as essential as creatine is. 

Here's what makes Ecdysterone the better choice:

• Ecdysterone has research published on its effects
• More published reviews due to it being more popular

And what may make Turkesterone the better choice:

• It may be more anabolic (but it's not proven yet)
• Turkesterone is a derivative of ecdysterone

Neither of these ecdysteroids needs a PCT or anything that maintains organ health. 

But it's recommended to be at least at an intermediate level with a few years of lifting experience because it'll make a difference when you reach a point where gains get slower.

If you were to take this as a beginner and made "noobie gains" you wouldn't know if it was just from training or with the help of turkesterone / ecdysterone. 

In order to fairly compare these two phytoecdysteroids, we'll need to look into the science. 

Found in foods like spinach and quinoa, ecdysterone is a compound belonging to ecdysteroids and it's been demonstrated to have benefits for muscle building. 

Ecdysterone works by being anabolic, without androgenic effects. [1, 2, 3]

Plants use cholesterol to create their own phytoecdysteroids. [4]

This is also how testosterone is also made, so that's something that plants and we have in common for growth. [5]

Ecdysterone is the main phytoecdysteroid found in Rhaponticum Carthamoids, which is where most research is done.

The summary is that phytoecdysteroids, such as ecdysterone, have anabolic properties by targeting estrogen receptor beta. [6, 7]

(Consider King Maker, which has both Turk and Ecdy)

According to a published human trial, binding ecdysterone to the estrogen receptor "ERβ", has resulted in increased hypertrophy of C2C12 cells, which means muscle cell growth and hypertrophy. [8]

Being able to bind to the estrogen receptor beta, can lead to increased muscle protein synthesis. [9, 10]

This all sounds great for bodybuilding and strength.

And while it's not banned by the WADA, researchers are actually recommending it to be on the list of WADA's banned substances. [11]

There was only one study performed on turkesterone, so we can still assume that ecdysterone is still the better option. 

One study performed in 1998 by the Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, researched used two preparations of turkesterone, derived from different parts of the A. turkestanica plant and performed against methandrostenolone, a form of the AAS dbol. [12]

The researchers found both sources of turkesterone were as potent as dbol with increasing body mass and organ size of the rats that used them. [12]

The paper above shows how turkesterone had greater anabolic effects than dbol. [12]

But unfortunately, the research is still new. 

The set of studies is too small to conclude confidently that turkesterone actually works just as well as dbol. 

And the rats that were used were actually sexually immature. [13]

So we may find that it works well for young athletes and not older ones. 

Another negative side to the study is that the rats were sedentary. 

Ecdysterone has better evidence for its effects and can easily be recommended over turkesterone. 

Here's a comparison of the studies conducted on Ecdysterone and Turkesterone:

Ecdysterone Studies:

1. A study published in PubMed suggests that the anabolic effect of ecdysterone, a naturally occurring steroid hormone, is mediated by estrogen receptor (ER) binding.

2. Another research article titled "Ecdysteroids: A novel class of anabolic agents?" discusses the anabolic potency of ecdysterone compared to other well-characterized anabolic substances.

3. A study titled "Practical uses for ecdysteroids in mammals including humans: an update" discusses the pharmacological effects of ecdysteroids on mammals.

Turkesterone Studies:

1. While there are fewer human studies on Turkesterone, it's believed to aid in muscle protein synthesis, promoting the development of lean muscle mass.

2. The study "Practical uses for ecdysteroids in mammals including humans: an update" also mentions the effects of Turkesterone on thymocyte energy metabolism.

Comparison:

The biggest difference between Turkesterone and Ecdysterone is that Ecdysterone has a successful human study, while Turkesterone does not. However, both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are thought to facilitate muscle protein synthesis and increase lean muscle mass growth.

According to research, there are yet to be adverse effects to be observed from phytoecdysteroid supplementation. 

This means both turkesterone and ecdysterone are safe to use and they don't have any toxic effects. [14, 15, 16]

But remember, just because there aren't any noted adverse effects, it doesn't mean it's completely safe. 

So be wise and use supplements that have third-party tests performed. 

For example, NootropicsDepot found that many turkesterone supplements don't even have 1% of the promised amount on dozens of companies.

NootropicsDepot is a trusted company and they've published their findings on turkesterone supplements here. 

1. Lift Vault - According to Lift Vault, both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are ecdysteroids and are not anabolic-androgenic steroids. They have similar benefits and neither have significant toxicity side effects. However, Turkesterone may be slightly more anabolic.

2. Transparent Labs - Transparent Labs points out that while the benefits of Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are encouraging, there's a concerning lack of regulation and quality in supplements containing these compounds. A recent analysis of supplements containing ecdysterone found that many samples were significantly less potent than the label claimed.

3. Fitness Volt - Fitness Volt discusses the Turkesterone vs. Ecdysterone debate in detail, including their benefits, side effects, and similarities. They also provide information on the best Turkesterone and Ecdysterone supplements on the market.

4. Testosterone.org - Testosterone.org provides a detailed comparison of Ecdysterone and Turkesterone, discussing which of these ecdysteroids is best for getting bigger and stronger.

5. Dr. Axe - Dr. Axe explains that Turkesterone is a bioactive compound found in certain thistle-like plants that grow in Central Asia. It has a long history of use in traditional medicine for its anabolic and adaptogenic effects. Turkesterone is similar to ecdysterone because both are natural phytoecdysteroids.

Just a heads up:

While these expert insights are super valuable, we're still scratching the surface when it comes to fully understanding Turkesterone and Ecdysterone.

So, what's the bottom line?

More research is on the horizon.

And remember, before you jump into any new supplement routine, it's always a smart move to touch base with your healthcare provider. Safety first, right?

User Experiences with Turkesterone

User experiences with turkesterone are generally positive, with many reporting increases in strength and lean muscle mass. Here are a few examples from reviews found on Lift Vault:

• Reviews Bros: They reported gaining 9 lbs in about one month, increased muscle mass, and increased muscle size. They used the German Pharma Turkesterone supplement, with a dosage of 500 mg of Uzbek Ajuga Turkestanica.

• Jacked University: This user reported gaining size in shoulders, arms, and quadriceps. Their weight stayed about the same (+2 lbs), but body fat reduced from 13-14% to 10-11% (estimated). They used the Gorilla Mind Turkesterone supplement, starting with 3 capsules per day and then increasing to 4 capsules per day.

• Cooper Doran: Cooper reported hitting PRs in overhead press and bench press. He noted negligible increases in lean body mass during strength training but saw increases in lean body mass during bodybuilding training. He used the Gorilla Mind Turkesterone supplement, with a dosage of 6 capsules per day.

• Vitruvian Physique: This user reported PR'ing bench press and seated overhead press. They gained 5 lbs of bodyweight in 60 days, with 2.4 lbs of lean body mass and 2.6 pounds of fat mass (based on a DEXA scan). They used the Gorilla Mind Turkesterone supplement, starting with 200 mg of turkesterone and ending with 300 mg of turkesterone.

What Does Reddit Think Of Turkesterone or Ecdysterone?

Ever wondered what the internet thinks about Turkesterone and Ecdysterone?

Well, Reddit, the internet's bustling hub of discussions, has got you covered.

Let's dive right in.

So, one curious Redditor popped the question:

Is Turkesterone better for size and Ecdysterone for strength?

The responses?

A mixed bag.

Some users cast doubt on the muscle-building prowess of these supplements.

But wait, there's more.

Another Redditor shared their Ecdysterone journey.

They doubled the recommended dosage.

And what happened?

Increased gym performance.

Rapid weight loss.

They chalked it up to a one-two punch of Ecdysterone and a keto diet.

But they're not stopping there.

Next on their list?

Turkesterone.

In another corner of Reddit, a user pondered:

Should I take both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone?

The verdict?

Again, mixed.

Some users questioned if these supplements even work in humans.

So, what's the overall Reddit consensus on Turkesterone and Ecdysterone?

Well, it's a bit of a toss-up.

Some users swear by them.

Others?

Not so much.

But remember, these are personal experiences.

Your mileage may vary.

And one last thing:

Before you dive into any new supplement routine, it's always a smart move to check in with your healthcare provider.

Safety first, right?

Q: How do Turkesterone and Ecdysterone work in the body?

A: Both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are types of ecdysteroids. They are believed to enhance physical performance and muscle growth by increasing protein synthesis in the body. However, the exact mechanisms are still being researched.

Q: Are Turkesterone and Ecdysterone considered steroids?

A: While Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are technically classified as ecdysteroids, they are not anabolic-androgenic steroids. They do not bind to the androgen receptors in the body and do not have the same side effects as anabolic steroids.

Q: Can women use Turkesterone and Ecdysterone?

A: Yes, both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone can be used by women. However, as with any supplement, it's important to consult with a healthcare provider before starting a new regimen.

Q: Are there any known drug interactions with Turkesterone or Ecdysterone?

A: As of now, there are no known drug interactions with Turkesterone or Ecdysterone. However, if you're taking any other medications, it's always a good idea to talk to your healthcare provider before starting a new supplement.

Q: Can I use Turkesterone or Ecdysterone while on a cutting phase?

A: Yes, both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone can potentially be beneficial during a cutting phase. They are believed to help maintain muscle mass while in a caloric deficit. However, individual results may vary.

Q: How long does it take to see results from Turkesterone or Ecdysterone?

A: The time it takes to see results can vary depending on factors like dosage, diet, and exercise routine. Some users report seeing results in as little as a few weeks, while others may take a few months.

Q: Are there any foods that naturally contain Turkesterone or Ecdysterone?

A: Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are found in small quantities in certain plants and insects. However, the concentrations in these sources are typically much lower than what you'd find in a supplement.

Q: What are the main differences between Turkesterone and Ecdysterone?

A: Both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are types of ecdysteroids and have similar benefits such as promoting muscle growth and enhancing athletic performance. The main difference lies in their anabolic potency. Some research suggests that Turkesterone might be slightly more anabolic than Ecdysterone. However, Ecdysterone has more human studies backing its effectiveness.

Q: Are there any side effects associated with these supplements?

A: Both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone are generally considered safe with few reported side effects. However, as with any supplement, individual reactions can vary. It's always recommended to consult with a healthcare provider before starting any new supplement regimen.

Q: Can I take Turkesterone and Ecdysterone together?

A: Yes, it's possible to take Turkesterone and Ecdysterone together. Some products on the market even offer a combination of the two. However, it's important to consult with a healthcare provider before starting any new supplement regimen.

Q: Which supplement is better for muscle growth?

A: Both Turkesterone and Ecdysterone have been shown to promote muscle growth. Some research suggests that Turkesterone might be slightly more anabolic, but Ecdysterone has more human studies supporting its effectiveness. The choice between the two may come down to individual preference and response.

Q: What should I look for when choosing a Turkesterone or Ecdysterone supplement?

A: When choosing a supplement, consider factors like the quality and purity of the product, the reputation of the company, and whether the product has been third-party tested. Also, consider your personal health needs and goals, and consult with a healthcare provider if needed.

Ecdysterone by far is the better choice when it comes to turkesterone and ecdysterone.

Not only does it have published human studies but it also has far more reviews across the web about its benefits. 

It's the best of the ecdysteroids. 

When it comes to ecdysteroids, you can also consider Sapogenix. 

And these supplements are considered to be the legal steroids of supplements.

If you're looking for well-researched phytoecdysteroids, then ecdysterone is the wiser choice, as it has more evidence than turkesterone. 

Considering this comparison, creatine vs turkesterone? Read the difference here.